%@ Language=JavaScript %>
Home > Spam/virus-infected
email PART 1:
Why the malicious
email message you received couldn't possibly have come from me It's a forgery;
a fake. And if most people
had been paying attention for the last few years instead
of thinking of the Internet as their personal, mindless little playland, then they'd know and understand how and why that sort of thing happens. And not a single one
of them -- not one -- is actually from me. Not
one, single one.
To the last of them,
they're all faked, forged, virus-infected or spyware-infected email messages and/or spams sent-out by self-replicating
virus programs that are hidden deep in the bowels of "robot" computers owned by unsuspecting people --
usually nice people, just like you -- who
won't bother to use and keep up-to-date any anti-virus and/or anti-spyware software... and maybe a firewall, too! Everyone should be
using, and keeping up-to-date, and a good anti-virus and anti-spyware program. Everyone! No one is immune from
the ravages of viruses and spyware; and email is the most common way that viruses are spread; and both email, as
well as certain kinds of web sites, and ad-supported, "freeware" software programs, are the most common
methods by which spyware is spread. Both are harmful; and both need to be kept in check by good anti-virus and
anti-spyware software, and guarded against by good firewall software, on everyone's desktop and laptop computers! Some of the best anti-virus
and anti-spyware software, and firewalls, don't even cost anything (at least not for
home users). They're FREE!
That's right... FREE... at least for home users. (Commercial users, companies,
offices, etc., must purchase the fee-based versions of these utilities.) So there's just no excuse for any Internet user not having, using, and keeping up-to-date a
good anti-virus and anti-spyware utility... and a decent firewall. A software
firewall to stand like a sentry at An anti-virus
utility to monitor your computer all A Host Intrusion
Protection System (HIPS) utility An anti-spyware
utility to periodically scan your en- A web browser
innoculation utility to "innoculate" A web browser
default home page anti-hijack utility A web browser
rating plug-in that warns of danger-
Fortunately, you don't need a separate piece of software for each of
these tasks. Some of the products which I'm recommending here
will perform more than one of the above. NOTE:
Windows now has a free firewall, and a malware threat detection
utility, built right into it. You may wonder, then, why
one would need anything more (or instead).
Please
read all of rest of this web page before downloading
and starting to use anything recommended here. You do not
necessarily need every single thing discussed here. You have
some choices... and the rest of this part of this web page will help
you to understand how to make them. Take your time, and really
make sure you understand before actaully doing anything.
NOTE: When this web page was originally created, I
recommended the free AVG anti-virus product (back then, it
didn't yet have an anti-spyware component... it was just
anti-virus). Today, frankly, AVG is my second choice.
I now prefer the anti-virus part of the free Comodo
Internet Security suite (which also includes a firewall
and a HIPS utility). However, as you'll read herein, there
are circumstances under which one might still prefer AVG... even
if one also uses, at the very least, the firewall part of
Comodo. So, I've decided to leave this AVG part of this
web page intact so that the user can read about it, and also
about Comodo, and then decide for himself or herself.
Please keep reading...
AVG's free edition will sit in your
computer's "System Tray" (or what Microsoft now wants us to call the
"Notifcation Area") in the lower-rightmost corner of your screen,
and will alert you, in realtime, if you happen to navigate your way
into a folder which has a virus-infected file in it (or if you try
to open or execute one), or if you try to download one, or if you
receive an email message with one attached. It will
automatically keep itself up-to-date; and it will perform a periodic
whole-system-scan on whatever automatic schedule you specify.
It's difficult to image what more one could ask of any anti-virus
software package... especially a free one.
NOTE: I no longer
recommend Spyware Guard; and I have personally
standardized on SuperAntiSpyware for that function
instead. What Spyware Guard does isn't
SuperAntiSpyware's only capability, of course (as you'll
learn further down herein); but it just so happens that
SuperAntiSpyware, if properly configured to auto-start with
Windows and then sit in the system tray, will also perform the
very same job that Spyware Guard performs. And
since I most strongly recommend that everyone download,
install and use SuperAntiSpyware (which, again, you'll
learn more about further down, herein), it's easiest to just
stop using Spyware Guard altogether and let
SuperAntiSpyware handle its task instead. That said,
I'm leaving this part of the article here just so the reader can
learn why monitoring for browser hijacks is so darned important.
Hijacking your browser's default home
page is one of the first things which malware/exploits try to do
whenever they manage to sneak themselves onto your computer.
They do this so they can force you onto the web site of their
choosing whenever you next open your browser (or click on its "Home
Page" button).
WARNING: Do not install and use
any of the products recommended on this page until and unless
you first uninstall any other similar products which may
already be on your computer. One may only have one
firewall, for example, on one's computer; or only one anti-virus
product. One may use multiple anti-spyware
products, as long as they're of the manual periodic scanning
type (which the two recommended here are). And one may
use, for example, multiple browser innoculators, or even
multiple hosts file managers (although using more than one of
those is not really recommended, either). Still, even with
products of which there can technically be more than one, it's
dangerous unless you know, for a fact, that they will "play
nice" with one another.
NOTE:
For an amazingly-effective (and free) uninstaller tool,
download and start using the
Revo Uninstaller.
In its third and fourth most comprehensive uninstall methods
(which are user-selectable) it will not only run the
product-to-be-uninstalled's native uninstaller; but then,
when that's finished, it will go looking for files, folders
and registry entries which may have been left behind, and
will allow you to delete them. It's a fantastic little
utility. Download and
install
Spybot Search & Destroy
and use only its "hosts file" management capability.
All other of its capabilities are optional... and so I say
just ignore them. Definitely don't use "Tea Timer."
If you insist, though, you could use its innoculator and
real-time browser protection; and if you want to
occasionally do a whole-system anti-spyware scan... what the
heck... knock yourself out. It can't hurt
anything... but just know that SuperAntiSpyware and
Malware Bytes will do a far better job of spyware
manual scanning and removal. You can also configure
Spybot to auto-update itself every week or every day (or on
whatever other schedule you like). You could even
configure it to update itself, and then perform an
innoculation... all in the middle of the night, if you wish,
once a week. If so, though, just make sure you pick
some night when some other utility on this page isn't
performing some kind of scheduled scan. Download and
install
Spyware Blaster and
use it as your primary browser innoculator... preferably
instead of the innoculator in Spybot Search & Destroy,
but at least in addition to it, if you insist on using both.
Remember to update its database as the first thing you do
whenever you use it; then tell it to enable protection
against everything in its database, then close it.
Do this at least monthly...
preferably every couple of weeks... maybe even weekly,
though sometimes its database updates don't come out quite
that often. Twice monthly is just about perfect.
Download and
install
SuperAntiSpyware
and configure it so that it loads on Windows startup, allows
its icon to sit and be visible in the system tray, monitors
for browser home page hijacking attempts, puts itself onto
the Windows Explorer right-click context menu, and
automatically updates itself every few days. Then use
it to perform a manual whole-system anti-malware scan on
your computer at least once or twice a month... preferably
weekly. Start it up just before you go to bed and let
it run while you sleep (just pick a night that's different
from whatever night you told Comodo to do its weekly
anti-virus scan). Download and
install
Malware Bytes Anti-Malware
and just let it sit there doing nothing until you tell it to
manually scan your entire system looking for malware once or
twice a month (preferably weekly). Like
SuperAntiSpyware, start it up before you go to bed and
let it run while you sleep (but, again, just pick a night
when either SuperAntiSpyware or Comodo isn't
doing its thing).
Download and install
McAfee Site Advisor and use it to allow
yourself to be warned about potentially dangerous web sites
when you're using your web browser... then take seriously
and heed its warnings. Download and
install
Comodo's Verification Engine
and use it to test suspicious web sites for authenticity,
and be warned about ones you should avoid. When you're
on a site that displays a Better Business Bureau (BBB) or
Trust-e logo (just to name two), hover the mouse pointer
above them and see if Verification Engine thinks
they're legit. If it warns you that a site is fake or
a "phishing" site, stay away!
Don't even bother using
AVG unless you are
absolutely dead-set against using Commodo's
anti-virus (and, if so, then probably also its HIPS)
component(s). If you insist on using AVG, then fine.
It's quite good; and it will also provide real time
anti-spyware protection, which Comodo doesn't provide (but
for which deficiency the use of SuperAntiSpyware and
Malware Bytes more than compensates... so you
decide). Download and
install
Hijack This and
don't do a darned thing with it until and unless there's a
problem... and even then make sure that you really know what
you're doing before you dare launch and use it. Either
that, or make sure that you have the help of an expert.
Either way, make sure it's on your computer in case it's
ever needed.
WARNING: You may be solicited by, or
be tempted by the advertising of, other vendors who will offer free anti-virus software, anti-spyware software,
firewall software, or free online scans of your computer for viruses, spyware, trojans, worms and other exploits.
Do not be sucked-in by such offers... many of which are for
products which are, themselves, little more than spyware or ad-ware
or some other form of malware
in disguise! (Click
here for more
information)
The products I have recommended, herein, are all safe, reliable, and reputable. In most cases, they are best-in-class
of the free products that are out there. You may trust them; and you should trust few others.
That said, there are
other good products of their type out there... many of which that are
also free. The reason I warned, above, that most of the others can't be trusted is because darned few
of them actually can; and also because I didn't want to go to the trouble of listing
a lot of alternatives here when, in fact, I'm only recommending to
the reader what I've here recommended. 1. Always keep your copy of Microsoft
Windows up-to-date. Windows comes, from the factory, rife with all manner of bugs and problems. The truth is, if
you hired a programmer to write some software for you, and if what he delivered were as full of bugs and problems
as the first version of virtually anything that Microsoft sells, you'd
fire him in a heartbeat... and maybe shoot him, too, on his way out the
door! Microsoft is constantly patching bugs, security holes and other problems in Windows; and it makes those patches
and updates available to its users for free. But none of that does any good if said users will not actually download
and install said patches/updates. So, there. I've now
given you the best advice I have to offer on this subject. If you were a commercial or large corporate client of
mine, then my advice would be a little different, of course. But for home users on their personal computers, the information and advice you've now gotten from
this web page is about as good as any floating around out there.
Updated:
May 20, 2009
If you believe you've been spammed by this web site (or by me); or if you think you have received a virus-infected
or spyware-infected email message from it (or me), think
again.
You didn't get it from here... or from me. Believe it.
And if you'll just trouble yourself to read the following article, you'll not only understand why I couldn't possibly
have spammed you or sent you a virus- or spyware-infected email; but you will also learn how you can become part
of the solution to the larger problem that made you think I had sent you a malicious
email message in the first place.
Sadly, most people won't take the time to read the following article; and they'll just keep assuming that I'm spamming
them or sending them virus- and/or spyware-infected emails. There's not much I can do, I guess, about people who
insist on being stupid.
PART
2:
How
you got the malicious email message in the first place, and why it
seems like it came from me
PART
3:
Free
software that will both protect your computer, and will make sure it won't be part of the problem in the future
PART
4:
Two
last pieces of indispensable wisdom and advice that you should take very seriously
PART
1: Why the malicious email message you
received
couldn't possibly have come from me
I'm one
of the Internet's earliest and most intolerant anti-spam activists. Don't believe it? Click here and notice what kind of web
site it is; then scroll down to the very bottom of that page and notice who's donating its domain name registration
services.
I don't send spam. Period. Never have. Never will. Believe it.
None of my web hosting or domain name services clients are allowed to send spam either. Ever. Not even once. I
have a zero-tolerance, "one-time-and-you're-out" policy about it. I'd terminate the web hosting and/or
domain name services of my own mother, in a heartbeat, if I discovered she was sending-out spam.
As for virus-infected emails... I don't do those, either. And, unlike most knuckleheads out there on the Internet,
I actually know how to ensure that it never happens (i.e., to ensure that my computer is never infected by viruses
or spyware which I could then pass along to you via email or some other means). After thirty years in the computer
business, that's the least of the things I should know.
"But," you say, "I have a virus-infected spam email message right here in my inbox... and your email address is in its 'From:'
field. So, then... precisely how do you explain that, smart guy... eh?"
Very simple:
It's not actually from me.
Really.
But, alas, most don't.
So, fine, then; I'll explain it...
JUMP
BACK TO THE TOP
PART
2: How you got the malicious email
message in the first place, and why it
seems like it came from me
I've been
on the Internet for many years, starting almost as far back as when it was the old "ARPANet," before
there was even such a thing as the "worldwide web;" and I've been on
the worldwide web since its very beginning in 1994. Consequently, my email address has been out there seemingly
forever. It's on web sites (both with and without my permission), in forum/bulletin board postings, in Usenet newsgroup
postings, and who knows where else. And it's been harvested from such places by every kind of spammer and malicious
hacker/cracker and virus-sender who ever lived. Everyone's got it; and literally thousands have abused it in one
way or another... including forging it into the "From:" field of their outgoing spam and virus-infected
emails.
I've also built and/or maintained some very high-profile web sites over the years; and in so doing, I've communicated,
via email, with literally thousands of people for one reason or another. Hence, my email address is in emails in
both the "Inbox" and "Sent Items" folders, as well as the address books, of more people than
I can count.
Why does that matter, you ask? Again, if
you'd been paying attention the past few years you'd know
that one of the most common virus spreading methodologies is for the malicious spyware or virus sender to send
unsuspecting recipients virus- or spyware-infected emails which appear to be from someone they know; and which invite said recipients
to view a photo, or open a game file, etc. When the unsuspecting and overly-trusting recipient does so, his or her computer becomes
infected with whatever virus payload said email was carrying.
Let's say this happens to Sally. The virus plants itself into the unsuspecting recipient Sally's hard drive without
Sally's knowledge. Then it just sits there, waiting for the next time Sally logs-in to the Internet; and when next
she does, then the virus, sensing a live Internet connection, comes alive. In the background, without Sally's knowledge,
the virus interrogates Sally's email inbox folder, and/or her "Sent Items" folder, and/or her address
book, and it randomly selects an email address therefrom. It then plops said email address into the "From:"
field of a virus-infected message that the virus is preparing to send out from Sally's machine, without Sally's
knowledge.
The virus then randomly selects yet another email address from Sally's
inbox folder, and/or her "Sent Items" folder, and/or her address book, and it then plops said address
into the "To:" field of that email that it's preparing.
Having filled-in the "From:" and the "To:" fields of its virus-infecvted message with email
addresses that it found on the unsuspecting Sally's computer, it then fires-off said virus-infected email message,
in the background, without Sally having any idea that it happened. The virus does this over and over again, every
few seconds, in the background, without Sally's knowledge, for as long as she's connected to the Internet; and
again the next time she connects, day after day, week after week, month after month.
Since it's likely that most of the email addresses in Sally's inbox, or "Sent Items" folder, or address
book are people that Sally knows; and since it's likely that many of them know each other, when the unsuspecting
recipient of the aforementioned virus-infected email from Sally's machine receives it, it often appears to be from
someone that he or she knows. For purposes of our little example, here, let's say it's Billy, Sally's boyfriend.
Since Billy know's most of Sally's friends; and since it's pretty much only Sally's friends whose email addresses
are in Sally's inbox, "Sent Items" folder, or address book, when Billy receives the aforementioned virus-infected
email send without Sally's knowledge from Sally's computer, he thinks it's from one of Sally's friends. Consequently,
Billy's unafraid to just go ahead and click on the photo or game file that's attached to the virus-infected email
message, and which said message invites him or her to click on...
...and, when Billy does, voila!, yet another computer becomes infected with
the self-replicating virus.
At that point, the virus would be on both Sally's machine, and Billy's machine... in both cases, without their
knowledge. And, in both cases, the virus then continues its dirty duty, only now it's doing it from two machines (Sally's and Billy's)... every few seconds, from
both of them; hundreds per hour; thousands per day... infecting, exponentially, the machines of everyone Sally
knows, and everyone Billy knows, and everyone that they know... and so on, and so on,
and so on, ad infinitum.
As earlier mentioned, my email address is in emails in the inbox folders, and in the "Sent Items" folders,
and in the address books of quite literally millions of people. Millions. If any of those millions of
computers happens to be infected with a self-replicating virus such as I've described here (and most of them are),
then my email address ends-up in the "From:" field (and, frankly, the "To:" field, also) of
literally thousands, or maybe even hundreds of thousands, of virus-infected
and/or spyware-infected emails, or spams (or both), every single day... day, after day, after day, after day, after
day, after day... forever.
That's right, all these careless, thoughtless, owners of virus- and spyware-infected computer would need to do
to stop all this from happening is use, and keep up-to-date, a decent anti-spyware or anti-virus programs, and
maybe a firewall, too. That's it. That's all they'd have to do.
But these knuckleheads -- and they are knucklehads if they're not
using good anti-virus/anti-spyware/firewall programs -- will just not take the problem seriously...
...and so, just look at the havoc they wreak on
the rest of us!
It was probably a virus-infected or spyware-infected email, or spam, that you received from just such a knucklehead's
computer that brought you here, today; and caused you to be reading these words, right now.
Kinda' makes you just wanna' just slap 'em, doesn't it?
And a FIREWALL software product is also a good idea... even for dialup users.
And, get this:
Of course, your having good anti-virus, anti-spyware
and firewall software on your machine still won't keep you
from receiving spam and/or virus/spyware-infected email from the machines of others out there in the universe.
However, it will at least ensure that no such malicious messages are sent from your computer. You may not be able to control the entire world, but you can (and should)
at least control your little corner of it.
JUMP
BACK TO THE TOP
PART
3: Free software that will both protect
your computer, and will make sure it won't
be part of the problem in the future
First let
me say this about "free" software: Usually it's not as good as the stuff that actually costs money. No
surprise there. Most makers of free versions of their products are just trying to get you hooked on their way of
doing things so you'll upgrade to their fee-based versions.
However, most makers of free anti-virus, anti-spyware and firewall software understand that viruses, worms, trojans,
spyware and other such maliciousness hurts us all; and makes the Internet a more dangerous and unwelcoming place.
So, many of them see it as a public service to produce a free version that at least does (and does well) the very
minimum things that a product of its type should do. Therefore, while certain well-known, fee-based products (like
Norton or
McAfee anti-virus products, for example,
just to name two) are inherently better in an overall sense; and while business and commercial clients are usually
forced to use only the fee-based products,
home users may avail themselves of some excellent free products for their personal use... products that get the
job done smartly; and which need make no apologies to anyone for their relative overall quality.
Yes, of course, if you can afford it and if you can keep-up with the annual virus definition file update subscriptions,
then most definitely get
Norton
AntiVirus
as your anti-virus utility. None of the other Norton products are worth a
damn, mind you... so avoid them like the plague. But Norton's anti-virus product, in various head-to-head tests
every year, finds more of the really obscure exploits -- including ones that aren't even in its virus definition
file yet; and, therefore, which it can only identify as a potential virus because it's suspicious in some way -- than any of
its well-known competitors. Believe me when I tell you that I hate loving Norton AntiVirus, but it's best-of-breed... like it
or not.
However, if you'd like a free anti-virus product that does an excellent job on home computers, then do not be afraid
download, install, and then trust the anti-virus product that I recommend, below... as well as all of the other anti-spyware and firewall
and other
products that I recommend here, too.
And if the trial version of McAfee's anti-virus product came with your computer (as so often is the case with store-bought,
name-brand consumer systems), de-install it and use, instead, the free anti-virus product that I recommend, below.
In fact, speaking of de-installing: Before downloading and installing any of my recommendations, below, be sure
to first find and then completely de-install any anti-virus, anti-spyware, or firewall software programs which
may happen to already be on your system. No computer should have more than one anti-virus scanner/destroyer, or
more than one anti-spyware innoculator, or more than one anti-spyware scanner/destroyer, or more than one... er...
well... you get the point. Always just have one of each kind of software utility on your
machine. My six reccomendations, below, each do something different and will not conflict with one another. They
may, however, conflict with other products of their respective types which you may happen to already have on your
system. So please first find all such products on your computer, and de-install them before doing anything I recommend,
below.
And if you have firewall or anti-virus or anti-spyware products from Microsoft, which came with Windows, either
de-activate or de-install them. Believe it or not, none of the Microsoft anti-virus, or anti-spyware, or firewall
products are as good as even the free ones that I'm recommending,
below.
In order to adequately protect your PC from malware and other
exploits, you need the following:
the gate of your computer's connection to the
Internet... blocking attempts by others to either
break-in to your computer, or attempts by mal-
ware already on your machine to "phone home."
the time, detecting any viruses, trojans, and other
nasty things which try to get onto your hard drive,
or which are attached to email messages, or which
sneak onto your machine via web sites or infected
CD discs, or music files, or document files, etc.
to intercept attempts by malware to launch/load it-
self, and then stop it dead in its tracks before it can.
tire system and detect worms, trojans, tracking cook-
ies and other exploits; then promptly remove them.
the Windows registry against a known list of exploits
so that if you visit a web site containing one, it will
be unable to infect your computer.
to monitor for attempts by malware to change your
web browser's default home page... a common tac-
tic of exploits as a means of sending you to web sites
which contain even more lethal malware and exploits.
ous web sites whenever you either see them listed in
Google search results, or try to directly access them.
And the answer, to put it bluntly, is that the "Windows
Firewall" and the "Windows Defender" malware
detection utilities flat-out suck. They're just
awful.
It's as simple as that, really.
The Windows Firewall actually does a reasonable (though
nevertheless ham-handed) job of blocking incoming break-in
attempts, but it's not very easily configurable; and, by
default, it blocks no attempts by malware already on your
machine to talk back out through the firewall... to, in effect,
"phone home." That's very bad.
Though it (the Windows Firewall) can be told to block
specific, known malware, that's a ridiculous requirement!
One would have to know that the malware's there, in the first
place; and then how to describe it to the firewall, in order for
outgoing blocking to even work. Since malware tends not to
announce itself, or to help the user understand enough about
itself to allow one to properly describe it to a firewall (or to
any other kind of) utility, the net effect is that the
Windows Firewall, as a practical matter, doesn't block
outgoing communications. And, again, that's very
bad.
The Windows Defender malware detection utility actually
isn't half bad (albeit also in a ham-handed sort of way) at what
it's intended to do. However, it has such an odd and
irritating behavior and user interface that most people grow so
weary of it so quickly that they would almost rather just turn
it the damned thing off and take their chances.
So, then... really... one should (and I'm recommending that
everyone) just turn off both of those utilities (and if one
knows how to do it, even disable their services) and just not
use them. The aftermarket products that I'll be herein
recommending are far better... and they will also integrate
themselves right into Vista's and Windows 7's Security Center
so that Windows will see and treat them as pretty much the
same as its own, built-in security utilities.
So, then... let's get started...
AVG
Free Anti-Virus & Anti-spyware
A credible
free anti-virus and anti-spyware utility
AVG is
made by a European company that has really established itself as a
respected player in the world of anti-virus software. Its free
edition, through version 7.x, has long been a staple for home PC
users; and its commercial/fee-based version is fast becoming
respected even by big corporate IT managers. Some are
beginning to purchase and use AVG's commercial products instead of
bigger and more well-known products like Norton or McAfee.
Some head-to-head tests of free AVG versus other free anti-virus
products (such as
Avira or
Avast, just to name the other two
top contendors out there) have suggested that the free version of
AVG isn't quite as good as either Avira or Avast. (Though its
commercial/fee-based version is apparently as good as any out
there... maybe even Norton or McAfee).
My experience is that it just depends on who's testing, and what
batch of test malware is employed in said tests. It's true
that AVG doesn't do as well as either Avira or Avast in some
tests... but, then again, AVG out-paces both Avira and Avast in
certain other tests. That said, it's probably not fair
to interpret that as me saying it's just a toss-up since it
seems that AVG really is a tiny bit weak in at least some areas.
However, the downsides of Avira and Avast cause most users to
trade-off the possibility of AVG missing something now and then
(which Avast or Avira might have caught) in exchange for AVG's
superior user interface (in the case of AVG vs. Avast), or its ease
of updating (in the case of AVG vs. Avira). Overall, AVG, when
compared with the other two, is the best of all worlds... and so it
is my recommendation...
...that is, assuming you won't end-up agreeing with my thinking
regarding Comodo Internet Security once you've read it, here,
in a few moments.
One thing that's really nice about free AVG is that it is now,
starting with version 8.x, more than just an anti-virus product.
It is now an anti-spyware product, too... two-in-one. However,
one downside of that is that free AVG is now a larger, more
resource-intensive product... a memory and process hog, some have
called it. On older machines, that could be a real problem.
AVG should definitely make it so that one can turn on or off either
of its parts so that those who only want the anti-virus component,
but not the anti-spyware component (or vice versa), may easily so
choose and configure.
Some users of the new AVG free edition also complain that it
contains a little slightly-less-than-subtle (but not terribly
obnoxious) advertising. There are, however, published "hacks"
floating around out there which can help one to disable it if one is
of a mind to so do.
AVG now also includes something it calls "Link Scanner," which will
place little rating icons next to links to web pages on Google (and
Yahoo, and some other search engine) search results. In a way,
that's similar to what McAfee's Site Advisor (which is
discussed further down, herein) does... except that Site Advisor
does more, and does it better. Again, you'll learn more about
that later. For now, just keep reading...
So, then, AVG's free edition is good stuff... no doubt about it.
Whether you decide to standardize upon it, however, is your call.
Personally, were I you, I'd strongly consider the free Comodo
Internet Security suite (described in the next section)
instead. It's three products in one: A firewall, an
anti-virus utility, and a HIPS utility. Granted, Comodo
doesn't have an anti-spyware component (yet... its maker says it
will have one soon), but my personal recommendations, further down,
herein, for what you should be using for any-spyware are better than
AVG's anti-spyware component in any case. So, though while I'm
not necessarily telling you to just ignore AVG, I'm almost
(darned near) saying something like that.
But just keep reading, and see what you think...
Comodo Internet
Security (CIS)
A firewall,
anti-virus and HIPS utility
CIS is a relative newcomer to
the world of anti-virus products. However, it has arrived with
a bang, to say the least. It started out as a
free firewall... and boy-oh-boy was it ever good at that! It
was so good, in fact, that it quickly eclipsed the previous free
firewall market leader: ZoneAlarm Free Edition.
In head-to-head tests by some of the best firewall testing labs on
the planet, even early versions of the free Comodo Firewall were
found to be as good, overall (but particularly in the area of "leak
testing") as any software firewall out there... including the
non-free, commercial, fee-based ones. In fact, by the time
version 2 of the free Comodo firewall was released, it was putting
ZoneAlarm to shame in pretty much every way. Even before the
free Comodo Firewall morphed into the larter Comodo Internet
Security suite that it is today, I started using the
firewall... and I've never looked back. I took ZoneAlarm off
my machine, and that was that.
Included with the free Comodo Firewall was a "host intrusion
protection system" (HIPS) component called "Defense+"
which added to the firewall's overall utility by stopping anything
from launching/running which the user did not expressly allow
(either individually, or categorically, depending on how it was
configured). That, too, made the old free Comodo Firewall
something to really get excited about.
But then it got even better when Comodo combined its free
firewall and Defense+ HIPs products into a bundled suite
which also included a full-featured anti-virus product!
Comodo named its new suite of three products "Comodo Internet
Security" (CIS); and among all of the various freebies of
its type floating around out there, it is my considered opinion that
CIS is best-of-breed. I kid you not.
Now, that said, it's true that the anti-virus part of CIS is still
being refined; and that it (as of this writing) maybe isn't yet
quite as strong as it will soon be. It might not even be as
strong, yet, as the free AVG anti-virus product mentioned above
(though it probably is at this point). However, starting with
CIS's version 3.9 (and especially once CIS version 4.0 is released
in the fall of 2009), the quality of even the anti-virus part of CIS
will no longer be in question.
However, one of the things that makes CIS so superior is how its
three parts -- together, as a group -- combine to create a virtually
impenetrable wall of security around one's computer (that is, if one
knows how to use it); and, as such, it almost doesn't matter
if one of CIS's three parts happens to be a little weaker than some
other stand-alone products of said parts's particular type.
For example, it isn't so much the anti-virus part of CIS that
protects as it is the anti-virus part, backed-up by the HIPS part;
and encircled, overall, by the firewall part. The work
together, as a team. Even if some piece of malware somehow
gets past the anti-virus part of CIS, then the HIPS part will
nevertheless stop it dead in its tracks whenever if it tries to
launch itself. And the firewall will likely keep the darned
thing from ever getting onto the system in the first place!
It's a killer combo, and I love it.
The only real downside to CIS (and really, the only reason why you
may want to hold-off on starting to use it until its version 4.0 has
been released) is that its HIPS component does, indeed, take a bit
of getting used to. It requires a better-than-average (or at
least a better than novice-level) technical understanding of things
in order for one to know how best to respond to its
sometimes-frequent, often arcane (and, therefore, sometimes
annoying) little pop-up warnings. CIS's critics complain, in
fact, that those HIPS pop-ups are so frequent and confusing as to be
a downright nuisance... and, actually, I sort of agree.
However, to its credit, it turns out that Comodo sort of agrees,
too... and so has pledged, by the time its version 4.0 is released,
that CIS will be the best-behaved (and least troublesome, overall)
product of its type anywhere out there! And my experience with
Comodo, so far, as a company, has been that if it says it
will do something, then by-golly it will. So, then, starting
with its version 4.0, even novices will easily be able to use CIS
without having to have any special arcane technical expertise.
Whether you decide to try CIS now, or to wait for CIS 4.0 (slated
for release sometime in the fall of 2009), is your decision.
I would say to just go ahead and give CIS a try now... but I have to
admit that if you're not really good at figuring out what its
technical pop-up warnings mean, then maybe you should just wait.
It depends, I guess, on how geeky you are. Of course, if
you're really all that geeky, then you probably already know
pretty much everything I've written on this web page. So,
maybe that's the acid test: If you learned anything from
reading this web page which you didn't already know, then maybe you
really should wait for CIS version 4.0... and just use AVG's
free edition as your anti-virus software until then.
The problem, though, is that if you wait for CIS version 4.0, then
you will have deprived yourself of being able to use its really
wonderful firewall which is (and has been for a long time)
completely "ready for primetime," as they say. There's no
better free firewall than the one in CIS.
Fortunately, one can download the entire CIS suite, but only use
whichever part of it that one wishes. For example, one can
totally turn off the anti-virus part of CIS, but use the firewall
and HIPS parts; or one can turn off the HIPS part and anti-virus
parts, but use just the firewall; or one can turn off the... well...
I think you get the picture. Any one, two or all three parts
of CIS can be used or not used, at the user's option... turned on or
off, at will.
So, then, even if you think maybe you're not up to the technical
challenges of CIS's HIPS component; and even if you think that maybe
AVG's anti-virus/anti-spyware would be better for those functions,
you can (and should) still download CIS and simply use just the
firewall part of it... easily turning completely off the anti-virus
and the HIPS components.
And that, in fact, is my recommendation, regardless: That no
matter what else from this page you decide to use, your firewall
should be the firewall part of Comodo Internet Security. I
used to recommend the free ZoneAlarm firewall, but it can no longer
hold a candle to the firewall part of the Comodo product. So,
no matter what, you should still download and install Comodo, even
if you would rather use AVG for anti-virus and anti-spyware.
But, of course, again, I'm not recommending that you use AVG at all.
I say that you should use all three parts of CIS. If the HIPS
part of CIS is too confusing to you, then fine... turn it off and
just use the firewall and anti-virus parts. AVG's anti-virus
isn't sufficiently better (or maybe not better at all) than the
anti-virus part of CIS to warrant downloading and running AVG
instead... or so, at least, it is my opinion. I'd say go ahead
an download and install CIS now, and if its HIPS (Defense+)
component is confusing, then just turn it off until the new CIS
version 4.0 comes out with its much easier-to-use HIPS component.
But you don't have to decide yet. Again, just keep reading...
Spybot Search & Destroy
A spware scanner,
with other nice capabilities
For many years,
Lavasoft's
Ad-Aware Personal Edition
was considered to be the best of the free anti-spyware products out
there. Then Spybot Search & Destroy (SS&D) and its
almost cult-like following took over the top spot; and for several
more years, that's the way it was. SS&D was king of the hill
(among the freebies); so, when I first created this page, that's
what I recommended here. And I still kinda' sorta' do... with
caveats.
Spyware -- almost more so than viruses -- has become increasingly
sophisticated... so much so that it has seemed, of late, that SS&D
just can't keep-up anymore... at least not as an anti-spyware
product.
Among free anti-spyware products out there, the much newer
SuperAntiSpyware and the Malware Bytes Anti-Malware
products (both also free... or at least both available in freeware
versions) have become the new anti-spyware freebie market leaders.
We'll talk more about them further down, herein.
Fortunately, SS&D is still useful for a few other things... and so I
still recommend that one download and install it... though, sadly,
not so much for anti-spyware prowess anymore.
SS&D also has an interesting "innoculation" component... a part of
SS&D which makes entries in the Windows registry to help protect
one's web browser against a long list of potential exploits which
can be secretly downloaded onto one's computer by malicious web
sites. It is SS&D's "innoculation" component that is at the
heart of SS&D's "realtime browser protection" feature (yet another
part of SS&D which makes it still useful, despite its anti-spyware
cabilities having become comparatively useless). Just so you
will perhaps understand better: SS&D's "innoculation" feature
is little different from what Spware Blaster (also
discussed further down, herein) does. But we'll get to
Spyware Blaster in a moment. Let's continue with all the
interesting non-anti-spyware stuff that SS&D can do.
SS&D also has an interesting and useful "hosts file" component... a
part of SS&D which will manage the Windows "hosts" file, which is a
list of web sites and/or pages, domain names, IP addresses, etc.,
which are (because they're listed in the Windows "hosts" file)
blocked by Windows from being accessible via its Internet
connection.
Most Windows users don't even know about the "hosts" file,
much less how keep it up-to-date and actually use it. SS&D,
however, will so easily help the end-user manage his/her "hosts"
file, that that feature, alone, makes SS&D worth downloading and
installing... even if its anti-spyware part is flat-out disabled.
Finally, SS&D has its own HIPS-like component (similar to CIS's
"Defense+" HIPS component). SS&D's "Tea Timeer" is a
credible HIPS-like feature. Sadly, though, it's even more
arcane than is CIS's Defense+. If one would be
technically challenged by CIS's Defense+ HIPS component, then
one shouldn't even consider trying to use SS&D's "Tea Timer."
That said, Tea Timer is pretty darned good if one knows how to
interpret its arcane messages. Tea Timer's admittedly a little
weaker than CIS's Defense+ in the area of detecting program
launch/execution, but it misses absolutely nothing when it comes to
detecting anything which any program tries to sneak into the Windows
registry... which actually ultimately makes it almost as good as
CIS's Defense+, regardless.
So, then... bottom line: Even though SS&D is no longer a
strong player among anti-spyware products, its "innoculation" (and
concomitant "realtime browser protection") capability, plus its
"hosts" file management capability, make SS&D worth having... even
if one doesn't also utilize its "Tea Timer" HIPS-like capability.
And, in fact, that's how I recommend that people use it: They
should use Comodo Internet Security (or maybe even CIS plus
AVG, if they prefer), and then also just the
innoculation/browser-protection and hosts file management
capabilities of SS&D, but not necessarily its anti-spyware
capability.
All that negative stuff about SS&D's diminished anti-spyware
capabilites having been said, SS&D could also still be used for
periodic whole-system spyware scanning. It couldn't hurt the
machine to do use it. However, either the free
SuperAntiSpyware or the free Malware Bytes
Anti-Malware will do a far better job than SS&D at spyware
scanning. Again, keep reading...
Javacool's Spyware Blaster
A browser
innoculation utility
Spyware Blaster is not an anti-spyware scanner/destroyer like
Spybot Search & Destroy (SS&D), or Lavasoft's Ad-Aware,
or even SuperAntiSpyware, or Malware Bytes.
Rather, Spyware Blaster (SB) is more
along the lines of an "innoculation" program... just like
the innoculation part of Spybot Search & Destroy... only better.
Like the innoculation part of SS&D, what SB "innoculates" against is spyware
that attacks or enters your system via your web browser as a result
of your visiting malicious web sites which try to plant nasty things
on your computer without you realizing it. SB will innoculate your copy of Internet
Explorer, or Mozilla/Firefox, or Netscape Navagator (the three
most-commonly-used browsers) against spyware tracking cookies, malicious Active-X
controls or Macromedia Flash components, hijacks, dialers, and all kinds of other irritating and potentially harmful
exploits. By "innoculating" the Windows registry against such
exploits, SB will stop them from ever even getting a foothold on
your computer.
SB is not a "sentry" running and the background and sitting in your
System Tray (or Notification Area). It moesn't monitor
anything in realtime. Rather, you download and install SB,
then you manually launch it, then you update its database, and then
you tell it to innoculate your browser(s) against everything in SB's
database, then you close it.
That's it. It doesn't run in the background. You just
open it, update it, use it, then close it. Period. And
you should repeat that every... oh... say every two weeks, or so...
at least monthly, no matter what.
Even if you also use the Spybot Search & Destroy innoculation
component, you should use Spyware Blaster. And
if you're forced to make a choice between them, the definitely
choose Spyware Blaster over Spybot Search & Destroy
for purposes of browser "innoculation." It's that good.
Javacool's Spyware Guard
A browser home page
anti-hijack utility
Spyware Guard is neither a spyware scanner/destroyer (like Spybot
Search & Destroy or Ad-Aware), nor is it an "innoculator"
(like Spyware Blaster). Spyware Guard (SG) is a
"sentry" which sits in your system tray (notifcation area)...
...doing only one simple (but important) thing: It monitors
the Windows registry for behind-the-scenes attempts by malicious
software and/or browser exploits to change the browser's default
home page behind the user's back, without his/her permission.
And that's pretty much all it does. No more.
And, in variably, said web site (of the malware/exploit's choosing)
contains even more evil crap which tries to sneak itself onto
your computer whenever you visit it...
...hence the need for you to know whenever anything is trying to
hijack your browser's default home page... and/or to allow you to
prevent same if you're warned (by SG) that it's happening.
Monitoring it in realtime is important, too, because if SG tells you
that something's trying to hijack your browser's default home page,
then it's a sure bet that your machine has been infected by
something nasty which you'll want to use one or more of the other
products mentioned on this page to remove... and fast.
So, all in all, having SG sitting, quietly, in your system tray,
watching for something -- anything -- to try and change your
browser's default home page is a good thing.
The problem is that SG hasn't been updated since 2004... which would
normally be alarming except that a utility like SG doesn't really
need to be updated all that often. Only if the part of the
Windows registry where the browser gets innoculated were to happen
to change would any sort of update to SG really be required.
And throughout all versions of Windows from Windows 95 through Vista
(and I'm almost certain also Windows 7), the part of the Windows
registry where browser innoculations happen has pretty much stayed
the same for years... hence the reason that SG hasn't been updated
since 2004.
That said, I dunno 'bout you, but it still bothers me that there
hasn't been a change to SG in so many years. That's simply
antithetical to security software, just generally.
But there's an even better reason not to choose SG: As it
turns out, the SuperAntiSpyware product which I'm about to
tell you about will, if properly configured, do exactly the same
thing as SG does... and SuperAntiSpyware is updated almost
daily!
So, the bottom line is that even though I've always loved Spyware
Guard, and even though it would be a perfectly good thing for
you to go ahead and use and standardize upon as your browser hijack
protection tool, I think that once you're read about the newer
SuperAntiSpyware product, you'll decide to let handle Spyware
Guard's job instead. Keep reading, and see if you agree...
SuperAntiSpyware
and
Malware Bytes
Anti-Malware
Spyware (and other
exploit) scanners and removerss,
and (in the case of one of them) a browser anti-hijacker
These are actually two (2) completely
separate products which aren't even made by the same company, and
have nothing to do with one another (other than their names tend to
get mentioned in the same breath a lot).
And I'm mentioning them here together because it is my strongest
possible recommendation that everyone should have (and keep
up-to-date, and periodically use) both of them...
first one, then the other... at least monthly... preferably every
one to two weeks.
The freeware versions of both these products do essentially the same
thing: Allow the user to manually scan either his/her entire
system, or just a specified part of it, for
viruses, worms, trojans,
rootkits, dialers, spyware, and all manner of other nasty stuff.
Either of them do it far, far better than Spybot Search & Destroy
ever did; and the salient benefit of having (and
periodically using) them both is that though either of them
is good enough to be your only periodic manual malware/exploit
scanner/remover, neither of them is perfect. There will always
be a tiny handful of things which SuperAntiSpyware sometimes
misses, but which Malware Bytes catches; and vice versa.
One needs them both.
In the past couple of years, these two products have distinguished
themselves as best-of-breed among utilities of their type.
Even the freeware versions are as good as (probably better than)
anything else out there for which others charge a fee.
So, you can forget Spybot Search & Destroy for anti-spyware
scanning/removal; and use both SuperAntiSpyware and
Malware Bytes for spyware scanning and removal, instead.
If you use Spybot Search & Destroy for anything, just use it
for its innoculation and comcomitant realtime browser protection,
and also for its "hosts" file management capability...
...and maybe, if you don't also use Comodo Internet Security
and its Defense+ HIPS component, then you might also wish to
use Spybot Search & Destroy's "Tea Timer" (but just remember
that CIS's Defense+ is far better than "Tea Timer").
Also, as first alluded to in the "Spyware Guard" section herein, the
freeware version of SuperAntiSpyware, if configured to
load at Windows startup and then sit, quietly, in the system tray
(or the "notification area," as Microsoft now wants us to call it),
it also performs the useful task of monitoring for changes to your
browser's default home page (aka, "browser hijacking").
But wait... it gets even better: By allowing the freeware
version of SuperAntiSpyware to load at Windows startup
and then sit, quietly, in the system tray, monitoring for browser
hijacks, SuperAntiSpyware will also be added to the Windows
Explorer right-click context menu so that you will be able to
right-single-click on a file in Windows Explorer to pop-up said
context menu, and then select therefrom the "Scan with
SuperAntiSpyware" menu item, at which point SuperAntiSpyware
will launch and do a fast scan of just the clicked-upon/highlighted
file so you can quickly check it for malware and/or other exploits
(without also having to manually scan the entire rest of the
machine).
The free version of Malware Bytes Anti-Malware can
also add itself to the Windows Explorer right-click context menu
(and be used in exactly the same way as described immediately
above), but it isn't necessary for Malware Bytes to be
running in the system tray in order for that to happen, like is
necessary in order for SuperAntiSpyware to be able to do
that.
But wait... it gets even better... yet again: By allowing the
freeware version of SuperAntiSpyware to load at
Windows startup and sit, quietly, in the system tray, monitoring for
browser hijacks, it will also monitor (check its maker's web site)
for updates to both itself, and to its spyware database... either
which need to always be kept up to date in any case. If
SuperAntiSpyware detects that there has been an update to itself
or to its spyware database, it will pop-up a little notification
which, if clicked-upon, will launch its internal updater, whereupon
appropriate updates, as needed, will be automatically downloaded and
installed.
So, by all means, download and install both of these products...
...even if you decide to also still use Spybot Search & Destroy
for occasional periodic whole-system anti-spyware scanning; and even
if you decide to also use it for its other capabilities discussed
here.
And even if you decide to standardize on AVG's free anti-virus and
anti-spyware product, believe me, SuperAntiSpyware and
Malware Bytes, together, will find things that AVG
misses (which is yet another reason why I say just forget about AVG
and use Comodo, plus SuperAntiSpyware and Malware Bytes, instead)!
And even if you decide to follow my best advice and
standardize on Comodo Internet Security for firewall,
anti-virus and HIPS...
...you should still also download, install, keep up-to-date, and
periodically (at least monthly... preferably weekly) use both
SuperAntiSpyware and
Malware Bytes Anti-Malware.
McAfee Site Advisor
A
browser plug-in the warns of dangerous sites
A new addition to this page is
McAfee's Site Advisor product... a free, little
browser plug-in (or "browser helper object" (BHO)) which, once
installed, sits inside your web browser and monitors the web sites
you visit, comparing them with its vast database of malicious web
sites, and warns you if you are about to land on one which may try
to download and install something nasty onto your computer.
Though Site Advisor both interrogates McAfee's database, and
also sends information to it about web sites which it has never seen
before (and/or which its users manually report), no personal
information which could uniquely identify you is uploaded to the
McAfee web site... so you'll have no privacy concerns.
The Site Advisor BHO simply installs into your browser
(either Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox... or both of them, if
you have both on your machine) and then just sits there, monitoring.
As it monitors, it also sends information about the sites you visit
back to McAfee (again, without personally identifying you in any
way).
Whenever the Site Advisor button (on your browser's task bar)
is green in color, the web site you're on is safe. Whenever
it's yellow, you should be cautious. Whenever it's red (which
also causes all kinds of warning pop-up, so you won't miss it), the
site should probably be avoided altogether.
You can configure Site Advisor to be more or less intrusive,
according to your taste. You can also configure it to put a
little indicator next to Google search results, thereby rating and
marking each web page link on a Google search results page according
to its likelihood of being dangerous.
And Site Advisor just catalog
the sites in its database. It massively tests them, over and
over, looking for all manner of bad things about which you should
potentially be warned.
Several other security companies
(McAfee's competitors) make simiar free products which directly
compete with Site Advisor...
...like Trend Micro's
Trend Protect, for example; or
WOT, to name another; or
LinkScanner Lite, or
Finjan SecureBrowsing... just
to name two more.
The problem with those, however, is that this sort of product relies
heavily on a vast database of web sites which the utility
interrogates every time the browser into which it's installed lands
on a web site; or to which the BHO feeds information about sites it
finds which are not already in the vast database. In order for
a paradigm like that to work well, there needs to be a lot of users
out there, constantly feeding information to the database.
It stands to reason, then, that the most popular and well-known of
this type of product would be the best one to use...
...and the most popular and well known of them is McAfee's
Site Advisor. Bar none. The others are popular,
and good... but not like Site Advisor. It's the
undisputed king in its software category, claiming to have
discovered, tested and rated better than 90% of all web sites on the
Internet. That's one huge database!
So, then... I could not more strongly recommend that everyone
download, install, and keep up-to-date a copy of the free McAfee
Site Advisor... and then pay attention to, and heed, its
warnings.
It's a very nice, simple, effective little utility that can
definitely keep you from visiting web sites from which you should
stay away... not so much because of their content (although maybe
that, too), but, more likely, because said sites are known to the
Site Advisor database (either because of user reporting, or McAfee's
testing) for trying to sneak malware or other bad things onto the
computers of those who visit or download things from them.
The Comodo
Verification Engine Utility
A browser utility
that detects fake or "phishing" web sites
This is a free product which is
in some ways similar to what the McAfee Site Advisor product
does...
...but in more ways, is not. Whether or not the Comodo
Verification Engine (CVE) would ultimately be useful to you,
only you can decide. I, personally, ,like it... but I'm not
necessarily strongly recommending it for others. Read on, and
you decide...
CVE sits in the system tray, running in the background. So,
unlike a BHO, it's running and visible even when one isn't using
one's browser... and is useless unless the browser is open.
Still, it performs a very useful function which, when coupled with
what the McAfee Site Advisor does, provides a very potent
little pseudo-suite of browser verification and reporting tools...
...tools which could very well protect you against really bad
things.
In a nutshell, CVE gives you the ability to verify that the site
you're visiting (or to which you're directed via a link in an
a e-mail message) can be trusted... which is absolutely
essential in the current Internet environment of fraudulent sites
and faked emails.
For starters, CVE helps protect against "phishing," which is when
scammers build a web site that looks just like your bank's, and then
sends you an email pretending to be from your bank which asks you to
login to the fake bank look-alike site to thereon "verify" (whatever
that means) your bank account web site login and/or password.
Once you've taken the bait and have logged-in to the fake,
look-alike site, you will have unwittingly given the scammer your
real login and password to your real bank
account...
...which he will promptly use on your real bank's web
site to summarily denude your real bank account of all
its real money... often in just seconds, and nearly
always in no more than just minutes.
CVE, however, can quickly identify fake "phishing" web sites, their
fake login fields, fake logos/graphics, their IP addresses which
don't quite jive with what they should be, their weird or flat-out
faked little padlocks in the browser information bar which makes you
think that the site is secure/ecrypted... and all manner of other
things which will indicate that the site isn't real... that it's a
"phishing" site.
At that point, CVE will instantly throw-up all kinds of warnings to
stop you from being taken-in... before it's too late!
Nice.
CVE performs essentially those same types of tests on other,
not-necessarily-phising web sites, too... notifying you whenever
you're on one whose "innards" aren't quite right... and which you
should, therefore, fear to use (or even to stay on). Once CVE
is loaded and running in your system tray, then all you have to do
to verify, for example, any logo which web sites like to display to
convey trustworthiness and instill confidence in its visitors --
such as the Better Business Bureau (BBB) logo, or the Trust-e logo,
just to name two -- is to hover your mouse pointer over said logo,
and then, voila!, CVE instantly tells you if it's the real and
authentic deal, or just a faked graphic put there to impress you.
Again, it's not quite what McAfee's Site Advisor
does... but it sure is a nice complement thereto... one well worth
your consideration, I would think. But, again, it's your call.
You decide.
The "Hijack This"
Settings Detection Utility
A utility for detecting malware which tries
to load at startup
Download and install this utility,
but don't actually ever use it until and unless you really know what you're doing.
I know that sounds like strange advice, but "Hijack This" isn't for the novice or the faint of heart. Improper
use of it can cripple your system and make Windows either unstable, or cause it to refuse to
load/start-up altogether.
The reason you should have "Hijack This" on your system,
though, is for moments when you're on the phone with
someone who really is expert (like me, for example,
just to name one person), and said expert needs to know certain things about your system which you could then read
to him or her over the phone from your copy of "Hijack This" (which, again, you would only
load and use with his or her help and/or under his/her direction).
To learn a little about "HiJack This",
and then to download and install it, point your web browser at
this
web site,
then follow the download link. Again, though, be careful: Install it,
but then do not actually load and use
it until
and/or unless you really know what you're doing,
or are told to use it by an expert (who will also tell you how).
The products recommended on this page all know how to "play
nice" with one another. So, before downloading and
installing any of these products, please uninstall any similar
products from your machine which may already be there.
Many computer makers put, for example, a complementary copy of
the McAfee anti-virus software onto their machines as shipped
from the factory. That would have to be removed before
anything listed on this page is installed and used instead.
And the "Windows Firewall" and the "Windows Defender"
anti-malware utilities would also need to be completely
disabled.
Please don't forget to do these things before using anything
recommended on this page.
THE BOTTOM LINE:
Though you have been given choices on this page, here is the bottom
line of what I recommend:
And that's pretty much it, actually. The above-listed, described and linked-to products will, if you'll just use them, adequately
protect your computer from the kind of harm that spyware, viruses, trojans, worms and other exploits -- as well
as hackers, crackers and others malicious -- might cause.
One of the most notorious examples of this is the
heavily-advertised (on TV), yet completely
good-for-nothing "Finally
Fast" software by "Ascentive."
STAY AWAY FROM IT! It claims to clean-up
your PC by, among other things, removing spyware... but,
in fact, it's nothing but spyware itself! And
those who got sucked-in by it and tried it report that
it's virtually impossible to remove.
Additionally, Ascentive, contrary to its advertising,
has never been featured (at least not editorially), or
hailed, or lauded, or in any other way written
positively about in such impressive publications as
Newsweek or The Wall Street Journal... that
is, unless Ascentive's having once advertised in those
publications constitutes being "featured" in the
editorial manner which Ascentive is clearly trying to
suggest (and shamelessly mislead) in its advertising.
As with all things in life, some products are better than others.
The ones I've recommended here are, in my personal and professional opinion, the best of the bunch. They may or
may not be as fancy, or have as many features as some of the others, but they all do the essential and basic thing
for which they were created better than most... and that is, after all, the whole point, right?
Regardless which product you choose, however, please at least make sure that you
become educated about spyware,
viruses, trojans, worms, hacking, cracking and other exploits; then learn about the products that will protect
you from them; then, most importantly, do whatever you have to do,
using them, in order to both protect your computer,
and also to make sure it's not part of the problem in the future.
JUMP
BACK TO THE TOP
PART
4: Two last pieces of indispensable
wisdom and advice you should take seriously
Once you're
done getting all the viruses, worms, trojans, spyware and other nefarious crap off your computer, you should know,
and appropriately act upon, the following:
You must pay attention to the update status of your copy of Microsoft Windows. If you have Windows's "auto
update" feature turned on, then, depending on how it's configured, Windows will either tell you about an update
and ask you if you want to download and install it, or it will just do it all automatically. If Windows ever asks
you if you want to download and install an update from the Microsoft web site (and first make sure that it's really
Windows that's asking, and not some exploit just pretending to be Windows), always do it.
If you have the "auto update" feature turned off, then at least remember to stop by the Microsoft
Windows update web site
at least four times a year and get your copy of Windows all caught-up.
The other thing that happens when you use the Microsoft Windows
update web site
to update
your machine is that your copy of Internet Explorer and Outlook Express get appropriate and needed security patches
so that known exploits cannot easily penetrate them. Please see item 2, below, for more on this.
The Microsoft Windows update web site will first assess your computer
and figure out what it needs, then it will recommend updates. To be safe, just always download and install whatever
it tells you you need. That's right: Put a checkmark next to every damned thing, and let 'er rip! Oh, sure, you
may not actually ever need the left-handed, scientific
notion version of the Outer West Mobovian italicized font set with extra fractions... but what the heck would it
hurt to have it on your machine, anyway. I mean... with hard drives as ridiculously huge as they are today, it's
not like you don't have the disk space. Just always download and install whatever the Microsoft
Windows update web site
tells you you need... even if you don't actually "need" it. Just do it. Trust me.
2. Every Windows computer will
eventually become "squirrely" or "glitchy" or in some other way weirdly and/or inexplicably
slow or unreliable or will start locking-up or crashing a lot, etc. It's just the nature of the beast. The reasons
why this happens are as many and varied as there are stars in the sky. Some of the time, whatever's causing Windows
to act weird is serious and can only be resolved by advanced diagnostics and then surgical editing of the registry
and re-installation of selected components... which is something that, typically, you should only allow someone
like me to do. But sometimes -- most of the time, in fact -- the resolution can be a whole lot easier... and here's
the little trick that computer professionals use to cure a squirrely computer of most of what ails it, most of
the time:
Just re-install Microsoft Internet Explorer
and
the Outlook Express email client.
Yes, you read that right; and here's why...
A few years ago Microsoft got sued by the US Justice Department for anti-trust violations because Microsoft so
deeply embedded Internet Explorer, a mere web browser, into the core of its Windows operating system that it was
difficult for browser competitors (like Netscape, or Opera, or Mozilla/Firefox, for example, just to name three)
to be installed into Windows and, thereafter, to become the sole -- or at least the default -- web browser. Microsoft
had made it so that Internet Explorer could not be removed from Windows, and one of the competitors' products installed
instead, without somehow crippling Windows... or at least seriously reducing its utility and function. In other
words, Internet Explorer, a mere web browser, contained core operating system elements without which Windows could
not be all that it could be. So Microsoft's web browser competitors got the Justice Department to sue; and Microsoft
lost that case.
So, from that day forward, Microsoft has been making it easier for competitors' products to more seamlessly integrate
into Windows. But that doesn't mean that Microsoft stopped including essential core elements and components of
Windows inside its Internet Explorer web browser; and that doesn't mean that updates and upgrades to Internet Explorer
don't fundamentally help/improve Windows itself.
Believe me when I tell you that unless Internet Explorer and Outlook Express are both present and healthy, then
Windows, itself, will not be healthy.
Your copy of Windows must have a good, complete, updated and healthy copy of Internet Explorer and Outlook Express,
even if those aren't the browser and email clients that you normally use. That's right, even if you use Opera as
your browser, and Eudora as your email client; or even if you use Netscape Navigator as your browser, and its component
Communicator as your email client; or even if you use Mozilla Firefox as your browser, and its component Thunderbird
as your email client... whichever Microsoft competitors' browser and email products you use, you must still keep
and maintain a copy of Internet Explorer and Outlook Express on your machine if you want your copy of Windows to
run smoothly and relatively error-free. You should never de-install them, or allow any other software's installation
routine to do so... like it, or not.
Windows machines become "squirrely" because core Windows components become damaged by hard drive crashes
or errors; or because said components get overwritten by lower-quality and/or less-reliable core components during
application software installations and/or updates; or because of spyware, viruses, worms, trojans, hacking, cracking
and other exploits.
Re-installing Microsoft Internet Explorer and Outlook Express -- even if those aren't the browser and email clients
that you actually use -- will not only overwrite Windows core components with factory-fresh ones, but if you re-install
a more recent and updated copy of Internet Explorer and Outlook Express, it will effectively update/upgrade your
copy of Windows, as well... thereby improving things in unexpected ways.
After doing so, it can be amazing how quickly and suddenly a formerly "squirrely" machine will suddenly
start running smoothly, or stop locking-up, or stop doing whatever else bad that it had been doing.
Yes, trust me on this: Re-installing Internet Explorer and Outlook Express -- especially after your machine's been
ravaged by a malicious virus, trojan, worm or some other kind of exploit -- can cause a seemingly miraculous improvement.
It won't cure everything, but it can -- and usually does -- snap back into shape a Windows machine that has merely
and inexplicably become... well... "squirrely" or otherwise "weird."
And always
remember:
Your first stop after re-installing Internet Explorer and Outlook Express should be the Microsoft
Windows update web site,
so you can make sure that all the current security patches and other updates did not get damaged or overwritten
by said re-installation; and/or so you can get caught-up on such patches/updates that you may have let slip by
you even before you re-installed.
The rest is now up to you.
Be a responsible netizen.
Go do your part... and leave me alone about it...
...that is, unless you absolutely insist on
contacting me.

Copyright
© 1994- by Gregg L. DesElms.
All rights reserved. Use by permission only.
For
contact information, click
here.
(Be
sure to turn off your pop-up stopper!)